void_am: кот Шредингера (Default)
void_am ([personal profile] void_am) wrote2016-03-28 03:54 am

20160328



Втрата хвилини - це серйозно: через неї Сігнуc пристикувався на три дні пізніше. Із супутником у важкому варіанті було б набагато трагічніше. Добрий урок для корупціонерів з Локхіда, які спочатку довго розповідають, що РД-180 немає альтернатив, а потім отримують післякримські сюрпризи.

Смішно, але Гугл на запит "РД-180 автоматика" видає суцільні скрєпи - "Почему лунные аферисты не могут сделать РД-180? Интервью академика Бориса Каторгина".

[identity profile] almarrus.livejournal.com 2016-03-28 06:17 am (UTC)(link)
статью явно луноложец на этом сайте разместил.

не знаю уж каков каторгин как ученый, но как руководитель он типичный совок. Его там на Энергомаше, похоже, использовали в качестве свадебного генерала, а рулили люди, формально находившиеся под ним. И они то воровали по черному.

[identity profile] apollo-13.livejournal.com 2016-03-28 08:59 am (UTC)(link)
Там скорее проблема с носителем чем с двигателем. В любом случае скорее всего легко исправимая мелочь.

"the premature shutdown resulted from the kerosene-fueled rd-180 engine burning with a higher than normal ratio of liquid oxygen, for reasons now under review."

[identity profile] apollo-13.livejournal.com 2016-03-28 09:32 am (UTC)(link)
ToryBruno ULA's President & CEO

Atlas first stage burned just under 6 seconds short. That left a delta-V deficit that Centaur needed to make up. Centaur made up that difference by burning about a minute long, delivering Cygnus into a precise orbit, far better that the accuracy requirement (as is usual). However, this consumed propellant, so Centaur's planned de-orbit burn was shorter. Consequently, Centaur impacted in the ocean a little further downrange than the original plan.
While this highlights the robustness of the system, we don't like anything happening that was not expected and are investigating this thoroughly. That's one of the reasons we have the mission success record we enjoy: Thoroughness. Every bit of data and every feature gets ground to dust by our engineers after every flight. (which is paid for on USAF missions by their ELC contract, BTW...)
In this case, because we consider it an anomaly, a very specific and structured set of investigation protocols is followed with a dedicated team.
We have a pretty good idea about the cause, but won't share until we are sure. That is another important discipline. We avoid jumping to the answer until the investigation is complete. That prevents us from narrowing in on a tempting answer too quickly before all the possibilities have been thoroughly investigated. By approaching investigations in this disciplined manner, you have the highest confidence of arriving at a complete, global, and permanent corrective action.
Over the years, I've found that its poor practice and bad luck to jump to the easy answer before doing the homework.
At present, I am not concerned about impacts to the manifest.